|
本帖最後由 HongKongPhone 於 2024-3-6 18:55 編輯
Algorithms better “learn” what expressions attract attention. Dating documents that are independent of social platforms seem to provide equal opportunities for exposure and browsing, rather than the platform deciding which users can be liked, and users do not have the opportunity to increase their visibility due to personal interaction behaviors. Dachanger public account extended from Dachanger blind date document Due to the large number of users, centralized information and professional organization and management of Dachang ER documents, the scope of communication and the
number of views are relatively stable. Users who have filled out their information have higher visibility in this context, and therefore are more likely to be matched and t opportunities. On the contrary, the decentralized user group Hong Kong Phone Number structure of Dateme.doc reduces the dating document to an "attachment" in the social media profile, as an extended version of the personal profile. The consequence of this approach is that if the document is not actively shared with others, People, no one will contact you at all. You can manually filter out objects that meet the conditions in the Dateme.doc directory. On the other hand, fields and

personal documents that are viewed by everyone put people on a "public shelf" that can be filtered by tags such as age, income, location, etc. People selectively present themselves to show their personal charm. And in exchange for selecting ideal objects, personal private lives and stories are made public, intertwined with the practice of watching and being watched in digital culture, which also makes the seemingly serious document practice of resisting social APPs become "commodity" "Exhibition" game. Book "Communicating in the Cloud" | (Nancy K. Baym) The mediaization process of online documents reflects the
|
|